The conventional geothermal power plants use the reinjection wells mostly to avoid the depletion of the geothermal reservoir gathering in the underground of the produced brine. Nevertheless, reinjection operations entail high economic costs and some risks. An alternative is the extraction of the heat without geothermal fluids production, the wellbore heat exchanger. The goal of the present paper is the analysis of the power production of the wellbore heat exchanger (WBHX) in time and the comparison between two different conversion systems of the thermal energy into electrical: the organic ranking cycle (ORC) plant and the Stirling motor. The selected case study is the oil field of Villafortuna Trecate, a medium enthalpy geothermal resource. The simulation results show a substantial decrease of the wellhead temperature in the first 6 months. After 1 year, the thermal power extracted with the WBHX is greater than 1.3 MW. The design parameters are 20 m3/h for the flow rate, outlet temperature 100.38 °C and the inlet temperature is 40 °C. The R-C318 has been selected as working fluid in the ORC plant: the net electrical power is 121 kW. The air is the working fluid in the Stirling motor: the evaluated net electrical power is 152 kW. The Stirling engine has an efficiency greater than 41 % compared to a system ORC.

Coupling of energy conversion systems and wellbore heat exchanger in a very deep oil well / Alimonti, Claudio; Berardi, Davide; Bocchetti, Donato; Soldo, Elena. - In: GEOTHERMAL ENERGY. - ISSN 2195-9706. - STAMPA. - 4:1(2016). [10.1186/s40517-016-0053-9]

Coupling of energy conversion systems and wellbore heat exchanger in a very deep oil well

ALIMONTI, Claudio;BERARDI, DAVIDE;BOCCHETTI, Donato;soldo, elena
2016

Abstract

The conventional geothermal power plants use the reinjection wells mostly to avoid the depletion of the geothermal reservoir gathering in the underground of the produced brine. Nevertheless, reinjection operations entail high economic costs and some risks. An alternative is the extraction of the heat without geothermal fluids production, the wellbore heat exchanger. The goal of the present paper is the analysis of the power production of the wellbore heat exchanger (WBHX) in time and the comparison between two different conversion systems of the thermal energy into electrical: the organic ranking cycle (ORC) plant and the Stirling motor. The selected case study is the oil field of Villafortuna Trecate, a medium enthalpy geothermal resource. The simulation results show a substantial decrease of the wellhead temperature in the first 6 months. After 1 year, the thermal power extracted with the WBHX is greater than 1.3 MW. The design parameters are 20 m3/h for the flow rate, outlet temperature 100.38 °C and the inlet temperature is 40 °C. The R-C318 has been selected as working fluid in the ORC plant: the net electrical power is 121 kW. The air is the working fluid in the Stirling motor: the evaluated net electrical power is 152 kW. The Stirling engine has an efficiency greater than 41 % compared to a system ORC.
2016
wellbore heat exchanger; geothermal energy; energy conversion plant; ORC; Stirling motor
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Coupling of energy conversion systems and wellbore heat exchanger in a very deep oil well / Alimonti, Claudio; Berardi, Davide; Bocchetti, Donato; Soldo, Elena. - In: GEOTHERMAL ENERGY. - ISSN 2195-9706. - STAMPA. - 4:1(2016). [10.1186/s40517-016-0053-9]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Alimonti_Coupling-energy-conversion_2016.pdf

accesso aperto

Note: Articolo completo
Tipologia: Documento in Post-print (versione successiva alla peer review e accettata per la pubblicazione)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 2.89 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.89 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/928898
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 34
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 28
social impact